Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 209, Issue 2 , Pages 180-187, August 2009

Association of Routine Pretreatment Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Time to Surgery, Mastectomy Rate, and Margin Status

Abstract presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Symposium, Washington, DC, September 2008.

  • Richard J. Bleicher, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence address: Richard J Bleicher, MD, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111
  • ,
  • Robin M. Ciocca, DO

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Lankenau Hospital, Wynnewood, PA
  • ,
  • Brian L. Egleston, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Linda Sesa, MSN, CRNP, AOCNP

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Kathryn Evers, MD, FACR

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Elin R. Sigurdson, MD, PhD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
  • ,
  • Monica Morrow, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Breast Surgery Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Received 3 January 2009; received in revised form 11 April 2009; accepted 14 April 2009. published online 18 June 2009.

Background

The benefit of breast MRI for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients is uncertain. This study characterizes those receiving MRI versus those who did not, and reports on their short-term surgical outcomes, including time to operation, margin status, and mastectomy rate.

Study Design

All patients seen in a multidisciplinary breast cancer clinic from July 2004 to December 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were evaluated by a radiologist, a pathologist, and surgical, radiation, and medical oncologists.

Results

Among 577 patients, 130 had pretreatment MRIs. MRI use increased from 2004 (referent, 13%) versus 2005 (24%, p=0.014) and 2006 (27%, p=0.002). Patients having MRIs were younger (52.5 versus 59.0 years, p < 0.001), but its use was not associated with preoperative chemotherapy, family history of breast or ovarian cancer, presentation, or tumor features. MRI was associated with a 22.4-day delay in pretreatment evaluation (p=0.011). Breast conserving therapy (BCT) was attempted in 320 of 419 patients with complete surgical data. The odds ratio for mastectomy, controlling for T size and stage, was 1.80 after MRI versus no MRI (p=0.024). Patients having MRIs did not have fewer positive margins at lumpectomy (21.6% MRI versus 13.8% no MRI, p=0.20), or conversions from BCT to mastectomy (9.8% MRI versus 5.9% no MRI, p=0.35).

Conclusions

Breast MRI use was not confined to any particular patient group. MRI use was not associated with improved margin status or BCT attempts, but was associated with a treatment delay and increased mastectomy rate. Without evidence of improved oncologic outcomes as a result, our study does not support the routine use of MRI to select patients or facilitate the performance of BCT.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Disclosure Information: Nothing to disclose.

 This work was supported, in part, by US Public Health Services grant 5P30 CA06927 and by an appropriation from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

PII: S1072-7515(09)00409-8

doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.04.010

Refers to erratum:

  • Correction

    Journal of the American College of Surgeons November 2009 (Vol. 209, Issue 5, Page 679)

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 209, Issue 2 , Pages 180-187, August 2009