Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 207, Issue 6 , Pages 853-858, December 2008

Is It Necessary to Harvest Additional Lymph Nodes after Resection of the Most Radioactive Sentinel Lymph Node in Breast Cancer?

  • Liang-Chih Liu, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Julie E. Lang, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Tyler Jenkins, BA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Ying Lu, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Departments of Radiology and Biostatistics Core, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Cheryl A. Ewing, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Shelley E. Hwang, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Shima Sokol, BA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Michael Alvarado, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Laura J. Esserman, MD, MBA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Eugene Morita, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Patrick Treseler, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Stanley P. Leong, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence address: Stanley P Leong, MD, Department of Surgery, UCSF Medical Center at Mount Zion, 1600 Divisadero St, San Francisco, CA 94143-1674

Received 30 May 2008; received in revised form 26 July 2008; accepted 12 August 2008. published online 02 October 2008.

Background

No consensus exists about the number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) that should be removed based on radioactivity counts in breast cancer, although the “10% rule” is often used. We hypothesized that the node with the highest radioactivity would have the strongest probability of being a positive SLN, and we sought to determine the lowest radioactive count of a node harboring cancer.

Study Design

We retrospectively studied 332 breast cancer patients who underwent lymphoscintigraphy by injection of technetium 99m-labeled thiosulfate colloid and sentinel lymphadenectomy (SL) between 1997 and 2006, with intraoperative determination of radioactive counts of nodes by a gamma probe. All SLNs were examined by permanent sections consisting of at least 3 levels of 40- to 100-μm intervals for hematoxylin and eosin evaluation, with or without immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratins.

Results

Seventy-four percent of patients had more than 1 SLN removed (mean 2.8 per patient); 23.5% had SLN metastasis. Of the node-positive patients, the hottest SLN was positive in 85.9% (67 of 78). Five of the 78 patients (6.4%) with positive nodes had counts less than 10% of those of the hottest node. The lowest radioactive count of a positive SLN was 4.2% of that of the hottest node. Lymphatic mapping based on the 10% rule could greatly improve the false-negative rates compared with removing only the hottest SLN (14.1% versus 6.4%).

Conclusions

Most positive SLNs had the highest radioactivity. Our institutional experience indicates that to obtain an acceptable false-negative rate, nodes should be removed until the 10% rule is met.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Disclosure Information: Nothing to disclose.

 Dr Lang's current address is Section of Surgical Oncology, University of Arizona Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1515 N Campbell Ave #1968J, PO Box 245024, Tucson, AZ 85724-5024.

PII: S1072-7515(08)01223-4

doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.08.008

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 207, Issue 6 , Pages 853-858, December 2008