Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 207, Issue 5 , Pages 763-766, November 2008

Surgical-Office−Based Versus Radiology-Referral−Based Breast Ultrasonography: A Comparison of Efficiency, Cost, and Patient Satisfaction

  • Rakhshanda Layeequr Rahman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, UMass Memorial Health Care, Worcester, MA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence address: Rakhshanda Layeequr Rahman, MD, Department of Surgery, UMass Memorial Health Care, 119 Belmont St, Worcester, MA 01605
  • ,
  • S. Crawford, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, UMass Memorial Health Care, Worcester, MA
  • ,
  • Tracey Hall, MSN

      Affiliations

    • Comprehensive Breast Center, UMass Memorial Health Care, Worcester, MA
  • ,
  • Diane Bavosi, RN

      Affiliations

    • Comprehensive Breast Center, UMass Memorial Health Care, Worcester, MA
  • ,
  • Robert Quinlan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, UMass Memorial Health Care, Worcester, MA

Received 27 May 2008; accepted 1 July 2008. published online 26 August 2008.

Background

The differences in efficiency, cost of care, and patient satisfaction between surgical-office−based (SB) breast ultrasonography by the surgeon and radiology-referral−based (RB) ultrasonography by the radiologist in the workup of lumps and imaging abnormalities have not been computed.

Study Design

Charts of 61 consecutive patients requiring breast ultrasonography at the Comprehensive Breast Center from October through December 2005 were evaluated. The SB ultrasonography approach was compared with the RB approach. Matching variables were patient age, presenting complaint, Gail risk score, ultrasonography findings, interventional procedure, and histopathology reports. Outcomes variables were efficiency (time from presentation and establishment of diagnosis), cost of care, and patient satisfaction.

Results

Twenty-nine patients had RB and 32 had SB breast ultrasonography. The RB and SB groups were similar in age, Gail risk, and ultrasonography findings. Median time to establish diagnosis in the RB group was 23 days, versus 1 day in the SB group (p < 0.0001). Median cost of care in the RB versus SB group was $659.00 versus $369.50 (p = 0.253), and net revenue generated was $85.00 versus $195.00 (p = 0.005), respectively. Forty-nine of 61 (80.3%) patients responded to the satisfaction survey. Forty-seven of 49 (96%) patients expect the diagnosis to be established within 48 hours. Twenty-eight of 28 (100%) patients in the SB group regarded their imaging study to be efficient, versus 5 of 21 patients in the RB group (p = 0.005); 16 of 21 in the RB group versus 26 of 28 in the SB group thought they adequately understood the ultrasonography findings at the time of study (p = 0.051). Twenty-four (86%) SB patients versus 14 (67%) RB patients rated overall experience as excellent (p = 0.055).

Conclusions

SB breast ultrasonography is an efficient, cost-effective, and patient-friendly approach to breast problems.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Disclosure Information: Nothing to disclose.

PII: S1072-7515(08)00999-X

doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.07.006

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 207, Issue 5 , Pages 763-766, November 2008