« Previous
Next »
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 207, Issue 2
, Pages 227-232
, August 2008
Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of Breast Symmetry after Breast Conservation Therapy
References
- Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:665–673
- Breast conservation is a safe method in patients with small cancer of the breast. Long-term results of three randomised trials on 1,973 patients [comment]. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A:1574–1579
- Cosmetic results in 242 patients treated by conservative surgery for breast cancer. Scand J Plast Reconstruct Surg Hand Surg. 1999;33:419–422
- . Patient characteristics and treatment factors affecting cosmesis following lumpectomy and breast irradiation. Am J Clin Oncol. 2003;26:350–353
- The effects of sequence and type of chemotherapy and radiation therapy on cosmesis and complications after breast conservation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;35:661–668
- Breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: a 20-year experience with excision plus radiation therapy. Am J Surg. 2002;184:403–409
- Consensus Conference on Breast Conservation. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:198–207
- . Factors influencing outcomes for breast conservation therapy of mammographically detected malignancies. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;196:518–524
- Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:753–764
- Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma. [comment] J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:356–363
- Cosmetic results after surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy for early breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21:331–338
- The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC ‘boost vs. no boost' trial (EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups). Radiother Oncol. 2000;55:219–232
- . Cosmetic outcomes following breast conservation therapy: in search of a reliable scale. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;100:65–70
- Factors determining esthetic outcome after breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast J. 2007;13:140–146
- . A method for the evaluation of minor degrees of breast asymmetry. Plast Reconstruct Surg. 1977;60:812–814
- . Breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg. 1955;7:357–371
- Congenital breast asymmetry: subjective and objective assessment. Br J Plast Surg. 1994;47:95–102
- Turning subjective into objective: the BCCT core software for evaluation of cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast. 2007;16:456–461
- The use of a breast symmetry index for objective evaluation of breast cosmesis. Breast. 2007;16:429–435
- Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast [comment]. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54:471–476discussion 477−478
- . Aesthetic outcomes in patients undergoing breast conservation therapy for the treatment of localized breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:1442–1449
- Are cosmetic results following conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer dependent on technique?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;23:925–931
- Late cosmetic outcome after conservative surgery and radiotherapy: analysis of causes of cosmetic failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989;17:747–753
- . Is the reexcision rate higher if breast conservation surgery is performed by surgical trainees?. Am J Surg. 2004;188:45–48
- Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2000;179:81–85
Disclosure Information: Nothing to disclose.Supported in part by a grant from Madame Sarka Tourres.
PII: S1072-7515(08)00189-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.02.012
© 2008 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 207, Issue 2
, Pages 227-232
, August 2008
