Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 207, Issue 2 , Pages 174-178, August 2008

An Evaluation of Tactical Combat Casualty Care Interventions in a Combat Environment

    Maj
  • Homer C. Tien, MD, MSc, FRCSC

      Affiliations

    • Trauma Program and Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence address: Major Homer Tien, MD, FRCSC, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, Suite H-186, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5.
  • ,
  • Vincent Jung

      Affiliations

    • Trauma Program and Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Sandro B. Rizoli, MD, PhD, FRCSC, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Trauma Program and Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • , Maj
  • Sanjay V. Acharya, MD, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • Canadian Field Hospital, Department of National Defence, Petawawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • , LCdr
  • John C. MacDonald, MD, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • Canadian Field Hospital, Department of National Defence, Petawawa, Ontario, Canada.

Received 14 December 2007; received in revised form 11 January 2008; accepted 24 January 2008. published online 13 May 2008.

Background

Tactical combat casualty care (TCCC) is a system of prehospital trauma care designed for the combat environment. Although widely adopted, very few studies have reported on how TCCC interventions are actually delivered on the battlefield, from a quality of care perspective.

Study Design

This was a prospective study of all trauma patients treated at the Role 3 multinational medical unit (MMU) at Kandahar Airfield Base from February 7, 2006 to May 30, 2006. Primary outcomes were whether or not two TCCC interventions were underused, overused, or misused. Interventions studied were needle decompression of tension pneumothoraces and tourniquet application for exsanguinating extremity injuries.

Results

One hundred thirty-four trauma patients were treated at the Role 3 MMU during the study period. Six patients had eight tourniquets applied. Five tourniquets were applied to four patients appropriately and saved their lives. There was one case of misuse where a venous tourniquet was applied. There was one case of overuse where one patient had two tourniquets placed for 4 hours on extremities with no vascular injury. There were seven cases where needle decompression was underused: seven patients presented with vital signs absent with no needle decompression. There was one case of overuse of needle decompression. There were seven cases of misuse where the patients were decompressed too medially.

Conclusions

Tourniquets save lives. Needle decompression can save lives, but is usually performed in patients with multiple critical injuries. TCCC instructors must reinforce proper techniques and indications for each procedure to ensure that the quality of care provided to injured soldiers on the battlefield remains high.

Abbreviations and Acronyms: ND, needle decompression, Role 3 MMU, Role 3 multinational medical unit, TCCC, tactical combat casualty care

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Disclosure Information: Nothing to disclose.

 This study received financial support from the Military Health Services Research Program, Surgeon General's Office, Canadian Forces Health Services Group.

PII: S1072-7515(08)00182-8

doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.01.065

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 207, Issue 2 , Pages 174-178, August 2008