Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 206, Issue 5 , Pages 1038-1042, May 2008

Axillary Reverse Mapping: Mapping and Preserving Arm Lymphatics May Be Important in Preventing Lymphedema During Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Presented at the Southern Surgical Association 119th Annual Meeting, Hot Springs, VA, December 2007.

  • Cristiano Boneti, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and the Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, Little Rock, AR
    • Drs Boneti and Klimberg are supported by the Fashion Footwear Association of New York
  • ,
  • Soheila Korourian, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and the Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, Little Rock, AR
    • Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.
  • ,
  • Keiva Bland, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and the Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, Little Rock, AR
    • Drs Bland, Cox, and Klimberg are supported by the Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Clinical Fellowship and the Arkansas Breast Cancer Act.
  • ,
  • Kristin Cox, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and the Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, Little Rock, AR
    • Drs Bland, Cox, and Klimberg are supported by the Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Clinical Fellowship and the Arkansas Breast Cancer Act.
  • ,
  • Laura L. Adkins, MS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and the Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, Little Rock, AR
  • ,
  • Ronda S. Henry-Tillman, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and the Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, Little Rock, AR
  • ,
  • V. Suzanne Klimberg, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and the Winthrop P Rockefeller Cancer Institute, Little Rock, AR
    • Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence address: V Suzanne Klimberg, MD, 4301 West Markham, Slot 725, Little Rock, AR 72205-7199.
    • Drs Boneti and Klimberg are supported by the Fashion Footwear Association of New York
    • Drs Bland, Cox, and Klimberg are supported by the Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Clinical Fellowship and the Arkansas Breast Cancer Act.

Received 12 December 2007; accepted 13 December 2007. published online 29 February 2008.

Background

Several recent reports have shown a lymphedema rate of about 7% with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) only. We hypothesized that this higher than expected rate of lymphedema may be secondary to disruption of arm lymphatics during an SLNB procedure.

Study Design

This IRB-approved study, from May 2006 to June 2007, involved patients undergoing SLNB with or without axillary lymph node dissection. After sentinel lymph node (SLN) localization with subareolar technetium was assured, 2 to 5 mL of dermal blue dye was injected in the upper inner arm for localization of lymphatics draining the arm (axillary reverse mapping, ARM). The SLNB was then performed through an incision in the axilla. Data were collected on identification rates of hot versus blue nodes, variations in ARM lymphatic drainage that might impact SLNB, crossover between the hot and the blue lymphatics, and final pathologic nodal diagnosis.

Results

Median age was 57.6±12.5 years. Lymphatics draining the arm were near or in the SLN field in 42.7% (56 of 131) of the patients, placing the patient at risk for disruption if not identified and preserved during an SLNB or axillary lymph node dissection. ARM demonstrated that arm lymphatics do not cross over with the SLN drainage of the breast 96.1% of the time and that none of the ARM lymph nodes removed were positive, even when the SLN was (5 of 12). Seven (5.5%) blue ARM lymphatics were juxtaposed to the hot SLNBs.

Conclusions

Disruption of the blue ARM node because of proximity to the hot SLN may explain the surprisingly high rate of lymphedema seen after SLNB. Identifying and preserving the ARM blue nodes may translate into a lower incidence of lymphedema with SLNB and axillary lymph node dissection.

Abbreviations and Acronyms: ALND, axillary lymph node dissection, ARM, axillary reverse mapping, SLN, sentinel lymph node, SLNB, sentinel lymph node biopsy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Competing Interests Declared: Dr Klimberg is a consultant for Ethicon Endo-Surgery.The study is also funded by the Tenenbaum Breast Cancer Research Fund.

PII: S1072-7515(07)01983-7

doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.022

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 206, Issue 5 , Pages 1038-1042, May 2008