Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 203, Issue 4 , Pages 498-505, October 2006

Outcomes after Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: The “Halo Effect” of Trauma Center Designation

  • Garth H. Utter, MD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA
    • Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence address: Garth H Utter, MD, MSc, Department of Surgery, University of California-Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Rm 4206, Sacramento, CA 95817.
  • ,
  • Ronald V. Maier, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Frederick P. Rivara, MD, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA
    • Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • ,
  • Avery B. Nathens, MD, PhD, MPH, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA
    • Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Received 20 April 2006; received in revised form 12 June 2006; accepted 13 June 2006. published online 23 August 2006.

Background

Trauma centers have an array of services available around the clock that help reduce mortality in injured patients. Having such services available can benefit patients other than those who are injured. We set out to determine whether patients hospitalized with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms experience lower morbidity and mortality at regional trauma centers than at other acute care hospitals.

Study design

We conducted a retrospective cohort study with the exposure being care at a trauma center and outcomes either mortality or organ failure. We evaluated all patients 40 to 84 years of age with a diagnosis of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm who underwent operation during 2001 in 20 US states with organized systems of trauma care. We determined the relative risk of either death or organ failure at regional trauma centers compared with nondesignated centers.

Results

Of 2,450 patients hospitalized for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, 867 (35%) hospitalizations occurred at regional trauma centers. At trauma centers, 41.4% of patients died before hospital discharge, compared with 45.2% of patients at nondesignated hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.71−1.02). After adjusting for payor, hospital beds, annual hospital admissions, annual inpatient operations, affiliation with a vascular surgery fellowship, and comorbid illnesses, the likelihood of death or organ failure was lower at trauma centers (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55−0.93).

Conclusions

Care at regional trauma centers after operative repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with improved outcomes. We postulate that these benefits reflect the ability of both vascular and general surgeons to immediately mobilize resources for care of the patient requiring urgent operative intervention. The beneficial effects of trauma center designation might extend beyond caring for the critically injured.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Competing Interests Declared: None.This project was supported by The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Injury Epidemiology and Control grant R49/CCR015592 to the Harborview Injury Prevention Research Center. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention did not participate in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

PII: S1072-7515(06)00904-5

doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.06.011

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 203, Issue 4 , Pages 498-505, October 2006