Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 195, Issue 6 , Pages 814-821 , December 2002

Surgeon volume as an indicator of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: An effect independent of specialty practice and hospital volume

This work was presented at the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Society of University Surgeons, Residents’ Forum, Honolulu, HI, February 2002.

  • John A Cowan Jr, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery (Cowan, Thompson), University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    • ,
  • Justin B Dimick, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery (Dimick, Stanley, Upchurch), University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    • ,
  • B.Gregory Thompson, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery (Cowan, Thompson), University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    • ,
  • James C Stanley, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery (Dimick, Stanley, Upchurch), University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    • ,
  • Gilbert R Upchurch Jr, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery (Dimick, Stanley, Upchurch), University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence address: Gilbert R Upchurch Jr, MD, 1500 East Medical Center Dr, Taubman Center 2210, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0329, USA.

Received 20 March 2002 ,Revised 10 July 2002 ,Accepted 15 July 2002.

References 

  1. Goldstein LB, Moore WS, Robertson JT, Chaturvedi S. Complication rates for carotid endarterectomy. A call to action. Stroke. 1997;28:889–890
  2. Wennberg DE, Lucas FL, Birkmeyer JD, et al.  Variation in carotid endarterectomy mortality in the Medicare population (trial hospitals, volume, and patient characteristics). JAMA. 1998;279:1278–1281
  3. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators . Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445–453
  4. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group . MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis). Lancet. 1991;337:1235–1243
  5. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group Hobson RW, Weiss DG, Fields WS, et al.  Efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:221–227
  6. Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R, et al.  Selective referral to high-volume hospitals (estimating potentially avoidable deaths). JAMA. 2000;283:1159–1166
  7. Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson EV, Birkmeyer CM. Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures (potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative). Surgery. 2001;130:415–422
  8. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HCUPnet, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/data/hcup/hcupnet.htm. Accessed September 24, 2002
  9. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project . Nationwide Inpatient Sample, Release 5. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Research and Quality; 1996;
  10. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project . Nationwide Inpatient Sample, Release 6. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Research and Quality; 1997;
  11. Public Health Service HCFA . International classification of diseases, 9th Revision, clinical modification (ICD-9-CM). Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1991;
  12. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method for classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies (development and validation). J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383
  13. Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data (differing perspectives). J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:1075–1079
  14. Lawthers AG, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, et al.  Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid?. Med Care. 2000;38:785–795
  15. Cebul RD, Snow RJ, Pine R, et al.  Indications, outcomes, and provider volumes for carotid endarterectomy. JAMA. 1998;279:1282–1287
  16. Hannan EL, Popp AJ, Tranmer B, et al.  Relationship between provider volume and mortality for carotid endarterectomies in New York state. Stroke. 1998;29:2292–2297
  17. Kempczinski RF, Brott TG, Labutta RJ. The influence of sur-gical specialty and caseload on the results of carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg. 1986;3:911–916
  18. Morasch MD, Parker MA, Feinglass J, et al.  Carotid endarterectomy (characterization of recent increases in procedure rates). J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:901–909
  19. O’Neill L, Lanska DJ, Hartz A. Surgeon characteristics associated with mortality and morbidity following carotid endarterectomy. Neurology. 2000;55:773–781
  20. Ruby ST, Robinson D, Lynch JT, Mark H. Outcome analysis of carotid endarterectomy in Connecticut (the impact of volume and specialty). Ann Vasc Surg. 1996;10:22–26
  21. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relationship between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:1364–1369
  22. Khuri SF. Invited commentary (surgeons, not General Motors, should set standards for surgical care). Surgery. 2001;130:429–431
  23. Russell TR. Invited commentary (volume standards for high-risk operations: an American College of Surgeons’ view). Surgery. 2001;130:423–424
  24. Finlayson EVA, Birkmeyer J. Outcomes in vascular surgery (volume versus certification). [letter] Surgery. 2001;130:897–898
  25. Gibbs BF, Guzzetta VJ. Carotid endarterectomy in community practice (surgeon-specific versus institutional results). Ann Vasc Surg. 1989;3:307–312
  26. Pearce WH, Parker MA, Feinglass J, et al.  The importance of surgeon volume and training in outcomes for vascular surgical procedures. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29:768–776
  27. Kresowik TF, Hemann RA, Grund SL, et al.  Improving the outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (results of a statewide quality improvement project). J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:918–926

☆ No competing interests declared.

PII: S1072-7515(02)01345-5

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 195, Issue 6 , Pages 814-821 , December 2002

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution