Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 211, Issue 1 , Pages 73-80, July 2010

Predictors of Major Complications after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Surgeon, Hospital, or Patient?

Abstract presented at the American College of Surgeons 95th Annual Clinical Congress, Surgical Forum, Chicago, IL, October 2009.

Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Analysis and Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA

Received 25 November 2009; received in revised form 23 February 2010; accepted 23 February 2010. published online 07 June 2010.

Background

Regionalization of care has been proposed for complex operations based on hospital/surgeon volume–mortality relationships. Controversy exists about whether more common procedures should be performed at high-volume centers. Using mortality alone to assess routine operations is hampered by relatively low perioperative mortality. We used a large national database to analyze the risk of major in-hospital complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Study Design

Patients undergoing LC were identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 1998–2006 from states with surgeon/hospital identifiers. Previously validated major complications including acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary compromise, postoperative infection, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, hemorrhage, and reoperation were assessed. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed and independent risk factors of complications were identified.

Results

A total of 1,102,071 weighted patient discharges were identified, with a complication rate of 6.8%. Univariate analyses showed that advanced age, male gender, and higher Charlson Comorbidity Score were associated with higher complication rates (p < 0.0001). Higher surgeon volume (≥36/year versus <12/year) and higher hospital volume (≥225/year versus ≤120/year) were associated with fewer complications (6.7% versus 7.0%, 6.4% versus 7.0%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis showed that advanced age (65 years or older versus younger than 65 years; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.16; 95% CI, 2.01–2.32), male gender (AOR = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.10–1.19), and comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Score 2 versus 0; AOR = 2.49; 95% CI, 2.34–2.65) were associated with complications. Neither surgeon nor hospital volume was independently associated with increased risk of complications.

Conclusions

Major in-hospital complications after LC are associated with individual patient characteristics rather than surgeon or hospital operative volumes. These results suggest regionalization of general surgical procedures might be unnecessary. Rather, careful patient selection and preoperative preparation can diminish overall complication rates.

Abbreviations and Acronyms: AOR, adjusted odds ratio, CCS, Charlson Comorbidity Score, LC, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, NIS, Nationwide Inpatient Sample, OC, open cholecystectomy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Disclosure Information: Nothing to disclose.

 This work was supported by the Evans-Allen-Griffin Fellowship (Murphy), by the American Surgical Association Foundation, and a Howard Hughes Early Career Award (Tseng).

PII: S1072-7515(10)00183-3

doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.050

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 211, Issue 1 , Pages 73-80, July 2010