Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 208, Issue 1 , Pages 104-109, January 2009

Avoiding Common Technical Errors in Subclavian Central Venous Catheter Placement

  • Michael J. Kilbourne, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence address: Michael J Kilbourne, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, 22 South Greene St, T1R60, Baltimore, MD 21201
  • ,
  • Grant V. Bochicchio, MD, MPH, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD
  • ,
  • Thomas Scalea, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD
  • ,
  • Yan Xiao, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD

Received 11 June 2008; received in revised form 3 September 2008; accepted 5 September 2008.

Background

Proficiency in placing infraclavicular subclavian venous catheters can be achieved through practice and repetition. But few data specifically document insertion technical errors, which mentors could teach novice operators to avoid.

Study Design

Surgical, medical, and anesthesia textbooks and procedural handbooks were reviewed. Subclavian catheter placement technical errors described were identified and consolidated. Video captures from 86 consecutive patients receiving subclavian central venous catheterizations at an urban trauma center were evaluated. In each video segment, the number of attempts at insertion, the number of failures at insertion, and the technical error observed during failed attempts were recorded and tabulated.

Results

Of the 86 subclavian line placements attempted, 77 were successful (89.5%), with a total of 357 subclavian venipuncture attempts and 279 failures (78% attempt failure rate). There was a mean of 3.2 failed attempts per line (left side, 2.1 attempts; right side, 5.5 attempts). Junior residents (PGY 1 to 2) had more failures per line than senior residents (PGY 3 to 5): 4.1 versus 3.6. The most common technical errors observed were improper site for needle insertion relative to the clavicle; insertion of the needle through the clavicular periosteum; too shallow of a trajectory for the needle; improper or inadequate anatomic landmark identification; aiming the needle too cephalad; and inadvertent movement of the needle out of the vein before or during wire placement.

Conclusions

In subclavian central venous access attempts, there are six common technical errors. Mentors can improve novice operators' proficiency by teaching them to avoid these errors.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Disclosure Information: Nothing to disclose.

PII: S1072-7515(08)01456-7

doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.09.025

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 208, Issue 1 , Pages 104-109, January 2009