Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 211, Issue 3 , Pages 308-315, September 2010

Electronic Synoptic Operative Reporting: Assessing the Reliability and Completeness of Synoptic Reports for Pancreatic Resection

  • Jason Park, MD, FRCSC, MEd

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • ,
  • Venu G. Pillarisetty, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • ,
  • Murray F. Brennan, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
  • ,
  • William R. Jarnagin, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Michael I. D'Angelica, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Ronald P. DeMatteo, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Daniel G Coit, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Maria Janakos, BS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
  • ,
  • Peter J. Allen, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence address: Peter J Allen, MD, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021

Received 3 March 2010; accepted 5 March 2010. published online 14 July 2010.

Background

Electronic synoptic operative reports (E-SORs) have replaced dictated reports at many institutions, but whether E-SORs adequately document the components and findings of an operation has received limited study. This study assessed the reliability and completeness of E-SORs for pancreatic surgery developed at our institution.

Study Design

An attending surgeon and surgical fellow prospectively and independently completed an E-SOR after each of 112 major pancreatic resections (78 proximal, 29 distal, and 5 central) over a 10-month period (September 2008 to June 2009). Reliability was assessed by calculating the interobserver agreement between attending physician and fellow reports. Completeness was assessed by comparing E-SORs to a case-matched (surgeon and procedure) historical control of dictated reports, using a 39-item checklist developed through an internal and external query of 13 high-volume pancreatic surgeons.

Results

Interobserver agreement between attending and fellow was moderate to very good for individual categorical E-SOR items (kappa = 0.65 to 1.00, p < 0.001 for all items). Compared with dictated reports, E-SORs had significantly higher completeness checklist scores (mean 88.8 ± 5.4 vs 59.6 ± 9.2 [maximum possible score, 100], p < 0.01) and were available in patients' electronic records in a significantly shorter interval of time (median 0.5 vs 5.8 days from case end, p < 0.01). The mean time taken to complete E-SORs was 4.0 ± 1.6 minutes per case.

Conclusions

E-SORs for pancreatic surgery are reliable, complete in data collected, and rapidly available, all of which support their clinical implementation. The inherent strengths of E-SORs offer real promise of a new standard for operative reporting and health communication.

Abbreviations and Acronyms: CIS, Clinical Information System, EBL, estimated blood loss, E-SOR, electronic synoptic operative report, ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient, MSKCC, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, OR, operating room, PD, pancreaticoduodenectomy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Disclosure Information: Nothing to disclose.

 Awarded Poster of Exceptional Merit at the American College of Surgeons 95th Annual Clinical Congress, Scientific Exhibits, Chicago, IL, October 2009.

PII: S1072-7515(10)00359-5

doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.05.008

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 211, Issue 3 , Pages 308-315, September 2010