Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 210, Issue 2 , Pages 199-204, February 2010

Safety and Immunogenicity Observations Pooled from Eight Clinical Trials of Recombinant Human Thrombin

  • Jeffrey L. Ballard, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Vascular and Interventional Specialists of Orange County, Inc, Orange, CA
  • ,
  • Fred A. Weaver, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • USC CardioVascular Thoracic Institute, USC University Hospital, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
  • ,
  • Neil K. Singla, MD

      Affiliations

    • Lotus Clinical Research, Huntington Memorial Hospital, Pasadena, CA
  • ,
  • William C. Chapman, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis MO
  • ,
  • W. Allan Alexander, MD

      Affiliations

    • ZymoGenetics, Inc, Seattle, WA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence address: W Allan Alexander, MD, ZymoGenetics, Inc, 1201 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA 98102

Received 24 July 2009; accepted 29 September 2009. published online 11 December 2009.

Background

We evaluated safety and immunogenicity observations pooled from 8 clinical trials of recombinant human thrombin (rThrombin), an active topical hemostatic agent.

Study Design

Recombinant thrombin was applied with an absorbable gelatin sponge or spray applicator during a surgical procedure (day 1). Adverse events and laboratory parameters were monitored until study end (day 29). Immunogenicity was evaluated after study completion on plasma samples collected at baseline and on day 29.

Results

Studies included 583 rThrombin-treated patients (median age, 59 years; 54% men). Surgical procedures included: spinal, 33% of patients; hepatic resection, 14%; peripheral arterial bypass, 23%; arteriovenous graft formation for hemodialysis access, 18%; and skin graft after burn wound excision, 12%. Adverse events reported for ≥ 10% patients included incision site pain, procedural pain, nausea, constipation, pyrexia, anemia, insomnia, vomiting, and pruritus.

Five of 552 patients developed antibodies to rThrombin (0.9%; 95% CI, 0.3 to 2.1; day 29); antibodies did not neutralize the biologic activity of native human thrombin. At baseline, 12 patients had pre-existing, antibodies recognizing rThrombin (12 of 552; 2.2%; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.8); these patients had no previous exposure to rThrombin and their antibody titer did not increase ≥ 1.0 unit (≥ 10-fold) at day 29.

Conclusions

Results from 8 clinical trials collectively demonstrated that rThrombin is well tolerated in numerous surgical settings when used as a topical adjunct to hemostasis. Adverse events and changes in laboratory parameters were consistent with commonly reported postoperative events. Less than 1% of patients developed antibodies to rThrombin; the antibodies did not neutralize native human thrombin.

Abbreviations and Acronyms: AV, arteriovenous, MedDRA, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, PAB, peripheral arterial bypass, rThrombin, recombinant human thrombin

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The clinical trials were supported in full by ZymoGenetics.

 Disclosure Information: Dr Alexander is a salaried employee and holds an ownership interest in ZymoGenetics, Inc, and Dr Weaver is a speaker who has received honoraria from ZymoGenetics, Inc. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

 ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00491608, NCT00371215, NCT00245336.

PII: S1072-7515(09)01458-6

doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.042

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 210, Issue 2 , Pages 199-204, February 2010