Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 204, Issue 4 , Pages 561-569, April 2007

The American College of Surgeons’ Closed Claims Study: New Insights for Improving Care

  • F. Dean Griffen, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Committee on Patient Safety and Professional Liability, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence address: F Dean Griffen, MD, FACS, Highland Clinic, Department of Surgery, 1455 E Bert Kouns, Shreveport, LA 71105.
  • ,
  • Linda S. Stephens, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
  • ,
  • James B. Alexander, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Committee on Patient Safety and Professional Liability, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • H. Randolph Bailey, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Committee on Patient Safety and Professional Liability, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • Scott E. Maizel, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Committee on Patient Safety and Professional Liability, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • Beth Howell Sutton, MD, FACS

      Affiliations

    • Committee on Patient Safety and Professional Liability, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL
  • ,
  • Karen L. Posner, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Received 16 August 2006; received in revised form 3 November 2006; accepted 4 January 2007.

Background

All physicians must be vigilant in the pursuit of safe care for patients. While problems in care are identified, education that provides an understanding of these problems and guidelines for improvement can enhance patient safety. Our objective was to determine problematic aspects of surgical care, including care provided by surgeons before, during, after, and instead of surgery, that negatively affect patient safety.

Study Design

Four hundred sixty malpractice claims against general surgeons were reviewed by surgeons (FACS). All claims were closed in 2003 or 2004. The data collection was completed at five medical liability companies representing a nationwide distribution of surgeons. Surgeons also dictated or wrote narratives for each case. The quantitative data and narratives were later analyzed to determine events responsible for unsafe care.

Results

Surgeon-reviewers identified deficiencies in care that fell below accepted standards more often before and after operations than during them. These deficiencies were often the result of a failure to recognize surgical injuries, and many of these deficiencies were preventable. The quality of surgical care was satisfactorily met in 36% of cases. The most common procedures involving patient safety concerns were those involving the biliary tract, intestines, hernias, vascular system, esophagus, and stomach. The most frequent events leading to claims included delayed diagnosis, failure to diagnose, failure to order diagnostic tests, technical misadventure, delayed treatment, and failure to treat. Complications occurring most frequently were organ injuries, adult respiratory distress syndrome, and infection.

Conclusions

Closed claims reviews provide valuable data that may enhance provider performance through heightened awareness of common unsafe practices. Specifically, opportunities exist to improve surgical care provided during the preoperative and postoperative phases of treatment through continuing medical education to improve patient safety.

Abbreviations and Acronyms: ACGME, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, ACS, American College of Surgeons, ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists, PSPLC, Patient Safety and Professional Liability Committee

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Competing Interests Declared: None.

 This research was funded by grants from the American College of Surgeons. The opinions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the American College of Surgeons or the University of Washington.

PII: S1072-7515(07)00064-6

doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.013

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Volume 204, Issue 4 , Pages 561-569, April 2007